Fa
  • Ph.D. (2010)

    Philosophy

    Philosophy, Tehran, Tehran, Iran

  • M.A. (2006)

    Western Philosophy

    Philosophy, Tehran, Tehran, Iran

  • M.BA. (2003)

    Philosophy

    Philosophy, Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Data not found

    Contact

    Curriculum Vitae (CV)

    Substance and Essence of Aristotle’s Ousia and its Translation into Substance and Reality

    H Khosravani, H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Callicles versus Socrates or the Practical Life of the Politician and the Contemplative Life of the Philosopher

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Defeating the Shadow of God: Nietzsche on the Death of the “Christian God”

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Requirement of Voluntary Act in Criminal Law and Attempts at Its Moral Justification

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    A Philosophical Examination of the Arguments against Criminalization of Mere Thought

    Hamidreza Mahboobi Arani
    Journal PaperPhilosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 2, 2020 February 20, {Pages 125-144 }

    Abstract

    In the criminal jurisprudence, It is kind of an established and generally accepted maxim that we must never punish anyone for his mere thought (or thoughts) including his feelings, desires, fantasies, wishes, beliefs, and unexecuted intentions. Generally It seems that there are more or less convincing reasons that we must avoid punishing mere thought due to its unacceptable and undesirable consequences for both the individual and the society. In this paper, however, I will investigate into some discussions about the justification related to the maxim that any criminalization of mere thought is intrinsically (i.e., consequentially-independent) morally unjust and hence is culpably wrong. My investigation is here mostly confined to one kind of

    On the Translation of Aristotle’s Ousia as Substance

    H Khosravani, H Mahboobi Arani, SMA Hodjati
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Quine on Charity and Rationality

    H Mahboobi Arani, M Derayati
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    A Different Version of Immortality in Plato’s Symposium

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Value Fictionalism in Nietzsche's Philosophy (A Reconsideration of Nadeem Hussain's Version)

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Nietzsche and the Origin of “On the History of Moral Sensations”

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Happiness and Contemplation of Beauty in Plato’s Symposium

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    A Critical Look at The Good Life, Unifying the Philosophy and Psychology of Well-Being

    AH Mahboobi
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    “PRESUPPOSING THAT TRUTH IS A FEMALE” A COMPARISON BETWEEN NIETZSCHE’S PREFACE TO THE BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL AND KANT’S PREFACE TO THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON

    ARANI HAMIDREZA MAHBOOBI
    Journal Paper , Volume 13 , Issue 200122, 2017 January 1, {Pages 101-116 }

    Abstract

    Despite many differences between Kant’s work and Nietzsche’s, there are some very interesting similarities between their prefaces to their two main books: Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil and Kant’s Critique of Pure reason. In these prefaces, they both present critiques of dogmatism and metaphysics and hope for a philosophy of future which is far away from dogmatism. For Kant, it is still a critical metaphysics which he himself has built its foundation in Critique of Pure Reason, while for Nietzsche it still needs much work to emerge. In the current study, it is tried to explain these themes in three parts. My introduction paves the way for showing the similarities. The second part indicates what Kant and Nietzsche exactly mean by d

    «تصور کنید حقیقت زنی باشد» نگاهی به دیباچة نیچه بر فراسوی خیر و شر و دیباچه کانت بر نقد عقل محض‎

    محبوبی‌آرانی, ‌حمیدرضا‎
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Aristotle Christopher Shields, Routledge, 2007, xvi+ 456pp.

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    The Doctrine of Prime Matter in Aristotle’s Science of Nature

    H Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , 2012 January , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Aristotle presents his doctrine of prime matter in order to give an explanation for change and especially for generation and corruption. Hence, no surprise, the place to look for the origin of this doctrine is nowhere but Aristotle’s science of nature. The first three sections of this article examine the Aristotle’s explanation of this doctrine according to his teachings in the works concerning the science of nature and show that why Aristotle introduces such a thing as prime matter into his science of nature and what he does mean by that. Then, in the last section, I will show that Aristotle’s explanation of prime matter as the ultimate substratum of all things, at least as far as these works are concerned, is not plausible and witho

    Nietzsche and the Critique of Kantian Moral Psychology

    ARANI HAMIDREZA MAHBOOBI
    Journal Paper , Volume 39 , Issue 1, 2011 January 1, {Pages 53-70 }

    Abstract

    Moral psychology is an important part of ethics. Some of the recent interpreters of Nietzsche’s philosophy have tried to elaborate a Nietzschean naturalistic moral psychology based on his remarks and pose it against other positions in moral psychology, especially the Kantian one with its fundamental claim that third-person accounts of moral psychology have no bearing on a morality which purportedly guides us from the first-person perspective. Two of the main related constituents of Kant’s moral psychology are the concepts of will and deliberation, which in this paper I will try to show how, according to these recent interpreters, Nietzsche explains them entirely in terms of a system of desires, without any appeal to a separate will. If

    نیچه و نقد روانشناسی اخلاقی کانتی‎

    محبوبی آرانی‎
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    Nietzsche’s the Birth of Tragedy and Aristotle’s Poetics

    HR Mahboobi Arani
    Journal Paper , , {Pages }

    Abstract

    VIRTUE AND HAPPINESS IN SOCRATES’MORAL THOUGHT

    ARANI HAMIDREZA MAHBOOBI
    Journal Paper , Volume 48 , Issue 14, 1 January , {Pages 65-81 }

    Abstract

    The question of “what is happiness?” is among the most important questions of Greek philosophy. In those early works of Plato that very likely represent the views of Socrates, Socrates mainly focuses on moral issues and tries to get close to an explanation of the nature of virtue (or virtues), the happy life and the relation between virtue (or virtues) and the realization of happiness (Eudemonia). Given the Principle of Eudemonism, in this paper it is tried to examine Socrates’ views on the relation between virtue and happiness and defend what is known as the “Principle of the Sovereignty of Virtue”.

    Current Teaching

    • MS.c.

      Aesthetics

    • MS.c.

      Philosophy of Law

    • Ph.D.

      -

    Teaching History

    • MS.c.

      Aristotle’s Philosophy

    • MS.c.

      Logic and Methodology

    • MS.c.

      Plato’s Philosophy

    • MS.c.

      Political Philosophy

    • 2020
      Sepehri, Mohammad saleh
      Sensory perception and George Berkeley\'s idealism
    • 2021
      Alavi novin, Mahsa
    • 2021
      Mangenehchi, Hojjat

    Top

    New

      no record found